Systematic reviews and clinical trials form the cornerstone of contemporary health research, providing robust, evidence‐based insights that guide clinical practice and policy. Systematic reviews ...

When scientists and regulators need clear answers to health risks—such as whether Tylenol causes autism (it doesn’t)—they ...

A new publication in Nature Reviews Methods Primers provides essential guidance for conducting rigorous systematic reviews on studies with animals and cells. It also highlights the benefits of these ...

A qualitative systematic review finds informal caregivers adapt feeding strategies for children with cancer, with emotional ...

Oncoscope launches the first Real-time, AI-supported Living Systematic Literature Review designed for enterprise-wide ...

Systematic reviews remain a cornerstone of evidence‐based research, providing comprehensive syntheses of primary study findings to support clinical and policy decision-making. Central to the integrity ...

An ad hoc committee of the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine will produce a report to update the standards for systematic reviews as defined in the 2011 report Finding What ...

Despite rapid advances in large language models, this study shows that human expertise remains critical for producing rigorous systematic reviews, with AI best suited as a supervised support tool ...

Objective To synthesise data on the associations between cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and health in children and adolescents, evaluate the certainty of evidence and identify knowledge gaps. Design ...

Objective This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of exercise interventions in alleviating depression and ...

This systematic review and meta-analysis identified prognostic factors associated with early mortality in septic shock. The identification of these prognostic factors could aid in clinical risk ...

Objectives Maternal dietary practices are vital for improving maternal and neonatal outcomes. However, comprehensive ...